You are here: www.bacteriamuseum > Special feature files > Bioterrorism<
Related: go to: Bacteria and crime go to: Bacterial diseases in history go to: general categories: Pathogenic bacteria > Pathogens
Special feature: Bioterrorism
Bioterrorism is the term used for terroristic activities
in which biological substances are used to cause harm to other people.
What
is terrorism? (Source: Federal Emergency Management Agency).
Bioterrorism is a combination of biological warfare and terrorism and due
to the events in the world bioterrorism is currently receiving a lot of
attention. A publication by the National Strategic Forum on Mitigating
the Effects of Chemical and Biological Attack (Dec 1999) is still
extremely relevant today (Source: Inst. for Natuional Strategic
Studies).There are a number of diseases that can be used as a weapon.
There are two scenarios that are currently seriously dreaded. One is the
spread of an infectious disease through the air, the other is the contamination
of drinking water. It is not at all easy to choose a biological weapon
or to produce one. People have lived with diseases for ages, and have learned
to cope with many. Our body has inborne defenses against diseases, and
during life we have been exposed to many diseases, and become immune to
a number of them. See our exhibit on 'pathogens' to learn about bacteria
that cause disease. Our exhibit on 'pathogenicity' explains some of the
properties that bacteria have to cause disease. Finally, our immune system
is explained in a separate exhibit. So what are the requirements for a
serious biological weapon to spread through the air?
-
The disease must be severe and apparent within a short time: it must have
a short incubation time
-
it must be able to cause disease by inhalation
-
it must be possible to produce the causative agent in large amounts
at minimal risk.
This excludes a number of diseases that have a long
incubation time, are not severe enough, or to which a majority of the population
is immune (due to natural occurance or vaccination programs, such as measles
or tetanus). In general, viral diseases are unpractical to produce as a
weapon, since viruses can only reproduce inside a body or inside a cell
under laboratory conditions. This makes the production of viruses expensive,
technically difficult and tedious. In the past, there have been experiments
with smallpox (a virus which has been eradicated by world-wide vaccination
but which is still stored by a few registred laboratories). To work with
small-pox, people have to protect themselves to the highest possible degree,
see this picture
of Biosafety Level 4 containment (Source: CDC).
The same is true for the deadly but very uncommon viral diseases such as
hemorrhagic
fevers (Fact sheet) (Source: CDC). For this reason
such diseases are unlikely to be used as a weapon. But we can not rule
out anything. Read about the possibility of small-pox
as a biological weapon (Source: Center for Civilian Biodefense
Studies)
Bacteria are easier to produce than viruses. Therefore
bacterial diseases are the most dreaded. There are only certain bacteria
able to cause disease after inhalation.The diseases they cause must be
severe but uncommon, so that not many people are immune. The lethality
of a biological attack has been compared to that of a nuclear attack. See
this graph
of casualties (Source: CDC). Only
a few diseases are seriously considered as potential weapons for bioterrorists:
-
Anthrax, caused by Bacillus anthracis.
-
Plague, caused by Yersinia pestis
-
Tularemia, caused by Francisella tularensis
-
The reason why F. tularensis is a candidate weapon is that 5 organisms
can already be lethal when inhaled, as described in this Data
Sheet (Source: Health Canada)
-
Read about the
use of Tularemia as a biological weapon (Source: Center
for Civilian Biodefense Studies)
With these organisms experiments have been carried out to investigate
how 'suitable' they are to be used as a weapon. They were found remarkably
suitable, though there remain severe practical problems, mainly with the
mode of spreading/spraying (to be effective the organisms have to be spread
in a fine mist of aerosols), and the weather (humidity, wind, temperature)
strongly influences the effects. These 'natural enemies' of biological
substances, and some of the effective protection measures that can be taken,
are described in 'defending
against invisible killers' (LD Kozaryn, American Forces
Press Service).
What will be the effects when you are exposed to
one of these?
At first, nothing. It takes time for a pathogen to make a person ill.
You wouldn't see, smell or taste anything exceptional. Then you might fall
ill with symptoms similar to a 'flue or a cold, however these soon turn
severe. You'd see a doctor, and soon doctors would realize that there is
something seriously wrong with you. By then, a number of things will happen.
You will receive medication, and if you're lucky you'll survive, for at
an early stage antibiotics can be effective against either Anthrax and
Plague. The doctor will report the case and officials will set out an alert.
Then, probably, panic strikes. Can we trace down where and when the infection
took place? Who else got infected? Everybody with the slightest symptoms
would present to a doctor. Normal life could come to a stop. Where and
when will be the next attack? How will we konw? The effect of casualties
and deaths are estimated to be high (varying with the amount of agent,
the way of spread, the weather, etc), but the devastating effect on the
community will be immense. Exposed people further spread
the infection. An epidemic, either caused naturally or by terrorism, may last for months or longer.
How likely is it that terrorists produce bioweapons?
A fermentor is easy to build and operate. Pathogenic bacteria are easy
to get and to grow. The techniques to manipulate these bacteria to make
them more dangerous (make them resistant to antibiotics, for instance)
are harder but not impossible to obtain. Producing viruses is more complex,
as we saw above, but it can not be ruled out completely that terrorists
choose the hard and deadly way. In an interesting article examples are described of terroristic
activities involving biological weapons in the past (Source;
Scientific American). Or just check the facts from the past (Source;
Scientific American). The production of biological weapons can occur
unnoticed. The technical difficulty is to disperse the agent over a susceptable
and innocent people. This could be done with spraying airoplaines. Once
you realize what happens, you can hardly defend yourself. But at least
you can be prepared: Coping
with terrorism (Source: Fed. Emergency Management Agency).
A second scenario for a bioterrorist attack is
the spread of a biological agent through drinking water or food that
is contaminated on purpose. This can be an organism or a toxic compound
that poses a danger after swallowing. Again, the effect should be severe
and fast. The idea is not new: in every war there has been rumours that
the enemy was contaminating water wells, and sometimes they were. See this
historical
overview of bioterrorism and biological warfare avant-la-lettre (Source:
Fort Worth).
-
Cholera has been named as a candidate to contaminate water, and cholera
was endemic in large parts of the world, including the US, until recently. This proves that Vibrio cholerae, the organism causing cholera, can survive in moderate climates. However, our water-cleaning facilities would soon inactivate the organism, and cholera hardly spreads from person-to-person. Having said that, naturally-occuring outbreaks of enteric diseases by contaminated water supplies are frequently occuring, which shows that the system is not perfect. Terrorists know this, too.
-
Botulin, the toxin produced by Clostridium botulinum, is a potent
toxic agent that can be present in spoiled (canned) food
-
Salmonella. back in 1997 a cult group contaminated
salads with Salmonella to influence the results of county elections
(Source: Emerging Infectious Diseases). In general,
however, Salmonella is not regarded 'serious' enough to be used by terrorists.
Contaminated food would quickly be withdrawn from the shelves, and this
kind of terrorism (or threatening with it) is more likely used to blackmail
companies than to do serious harm to civilians.
-
The possibility that bioterrorism chooses our agricultural food supply
as a target can not be ignored. People would not be killed, but economy
would be crippled. The economic effect of the recent Foot-and-Mouth disease
in the UK could easily be equalled with a well-targeted shot of the virus
into a US cow. Agricultural
bioterrorism: a serious threat (Source: Iowa State Uni
Faculty of Vet. Medicine)
Finally, two more interesting links:
A
brief summary of toxins, including bacterial toxins (Source:
Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons)
Interview
with JM Henderson on Bioterrorism, are we prepared? (Source:
Action BioScience.org)
After reading this, you may not like the idea that bacteria can be used
to do harm on purpose. But don't blame them.
The content of this page is copyright of the Virtual Museum of Bacteria and was written by Dr. T. M. Wassenaar (curator), with support of the Foundation for Bacteriology (Dr. M.J. Blaser, President).
Special Feature files cover various aspects of bacteria, bacteriology,
and bacterial diseases and are produced with support from
Choose another exhibit in this catagory or go to another catagory from
the menue at the top of this page
Page last modified: 08 Mar 2005
This page will no longer be updated. We apologize for inactive links.